4.07.2007

Foreword

The right to an educated, defensible vote.

I get a glimpse of wrinkles of why’s often in my attempt to explain this advocacy. It’s useless, they say. The government’s corrupt anyway. It stings when told it’s hopeless. No, it hurts. One, because of its undeniably partial truth. We rate first, second, third most corrupt; first, second, third poorest. I see the sad roots of this remark. Two, however, is because the remark’s even sadder. You’re in your 20’s or 30’s and, already, you have dampened your own spirits, failed to see hope, given up on my home, and taken a passive non-stand (because that’s no stand at all) on the crux of the nation that affects, at the very least, your lifestyle, at most, your life, despite any amount of resistance on your part.

Forgive my indulgence in emotions. I love my country. It’s my home. It hurts when foreigners critique it; it’s insulting when my countrymen give no due respect for it. At the very least, have hope.

This is why we say, vote. Let us exercise our right because by some twist of fate, with our own share of responsibility, we might just be able to give to Leonidas a seat in government and inscribe in the pages of history and literature the greatness of our generation. The true spirit of elections, lest we forget, is change. And as much as every election period bears signs of the evils of the past, in the hands of the youth it may just be the means to a brighter future.

After all, the youth is a force to be reckoned with. Statistics show that for the 2007 elections, about 40% of the 43 million registered voters are under the age of 30. The United Nations Development Programme forecasts this number to rise to 72% in 15 years. The youth are an integral part of any society, but these numbers suggest this is truer in the Philippines than in most other countries.

The youth is the source of hope. Our optimism, paradoxically combined with inherent rebelliousness against the present, dictates change. But where the statistics above show how much we can do on the 14th of May, it also shows how much is standing in our way. The chief impediment, it appears, is ignorance – as much as we can blame the system for not arming us with bullets of information, in the final analysis, we have only ourselves to blame for the complacence to find out what we need to know.

As we perform the principal act of democratic citizenship, let us give testimony to the maturity of the youth and our readiness to take the reins of this nation. Have an educated vote, go beyond accepting apparent information. Study it like it’s an academic requirement, analyze the data as if it were for a thesis. And then decide. Decide such that we can defend them with reasons. Think logic. Go beyond personality and faces and the sound of the name. Think logic. All that are presented in this book are facts. All facts. Now, let us do our job and connect the dots. Decipher, decide, and defend. While suffrage is a fundamental right; an educated, defensible vote is the responsible exercise of such right.

5 comments:

Anonymous said...

I am an economist. A social scientist who tries to understand and model the behavior of human beings. One instance wherein economists attempt to model human behavior is exactly this instance; their dilemma to vote or not to vote. Economists have modeled human behavior, using Game theory and incentives, and have concluded that people will only go out to vote if they know that their vote will have a positive outcome on the election. If they believe they cannot help determine the outcome they will not go out and vote. If they believe that it will be more costly to themselves to go out and learn more about the candidates and make an educated vote, more so will they sit down and do something else. There is no economic incentive that spurns them on, and this is why, according to economists that people would rather sit on their butts and watch TV rather than troop to the polls.

Economists however are social scientists, a positive science. Positive, meaning, they model what people do, not what they should do. Yes maybe there is no "economic incentive" that will prod us to vote and to vote wisely but there is more to this world than "economic incentives"! Right?! We are a world of dollars and cents, of "what have you done for me lately" and our little houses on the hill, our comfort zones.
Going back to game theory, the optimal outcome is in actuality achieved when economic agents go against their "selfish" motives and go against their gut feel. Should they do this, then all players in the "game" maximize their utility; and society benefits the most. Translation, if everyone would drop the whole attitude of "i gotta get mine" then we would have maximum utility for all parties. If everyone got up and spent even minimal effort to get to know the candidates and base their vote on merit, not demerits then we would maximize utility.

But then again we are in a world of profit maximizers, not utility maximizers, apparently. We, in this modern day and age of technology and advancement have yet to perfect what ancient societies already knew : that when society gains, everyone attains the greatest benefits. Or have we?

Anonymous said...

But too many out there don't even get that. The first thing they really ask is what's in it for me? And if you answer that, what benefits the society benefits you, they'll give a duh look. It's not tangible for them. They'd rather go do their usual routine at starbucks for example than go out of their way to vote. besides it's true. too many politicians are corrupt. how do you reply to that.

Anonymous said...

someone told me comment. i dunno if i have to comment about the content of the site or what it tries to convey.

about the content of the site....
the site is simple and looks professional. the only problem i see is it wont attract the people targeted for this site.

what it tries to convey....
voting should be privileged to people who pays taxes. end of story.

Anonymous said...

everybody pays taxes directly or indirectly (e-vat, etc).. that means that everyone has the right to vote :)

Anonymous said...

I dont see where the site is supposedly trying to convey that only tax payers have the right to vote.. i dont think theres a mention of tax paying population anywhere in the entire site.